About Me

My photo
An ordinary man with extraordinary grit.. I revolve around the fact that.. "It is easy to welcome innovation and accept new ideas. What most people find difficult, however, is accepting the way these new ideas are put into practice." so lets do it.. Lets change for better..! And yes.. Information in this blog is all free. All credits to medscape and their sister journals for such an awesome job (in my medical knowledge center). I am just being a carrier for their information. So Study, Enjoy, Hangout and Cheers for Life..!

'Brain Fitness' Program Improves Memory


'Brain Fitness' Program Improves Memory

Deborah Brauser
Physician Rating: 4.5 stars  ( 43 Votes )           
Rate This Article:
  
    
September 1, 2011 — A combination of brain exercises and healthy lifestyle changes can improve memory performance in healthy elderly adults, new research suggests.
In a sample study of 115 participants from 2 live-in retirement communities, those who underwent a new educational program (that included memory training, physical activity, stress reduction, and better diet) showed significant improvements on a variety of measures after just 6 weeks, including word recognition and recall.
"I was very pleased with these significant results in a sample that was not huge," senior study author Gary Small, MD, professor of aging at the University of California–Los Angeles (UCLA) and director of the UCLA Longevity Center, told Medscape Medical News.
Dr. Gary Small
He noted that the investigators wanted to test whether this intervention improved both objective and subjective memory performance.
"Subjective memory is a person's self-perception of how they're doing, and objective is how well they do on a pen-and-paper test. It was gratifying to see that this program seemed to be helping people in day-to-day memory challenges."
Lead author Karen Miller, PhD, associate clinical professor at the Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, said in a release that "it was exciting" to see the subjects' participation, as well as their improvements in the memory fitness program.
"The study demonstrates that it's never too late to learn new skills to enhance one's life," added Dr. Miller.
The study was published online July 14 in the American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.
Emphasizing a "Healthy Brain"
"Despite the effectiveness of memory training interventions in clinical trials, few community-based programs exist, and their effects have not been systematically tested," write the investigators.
The new memory training program, which was created by Dr. Small and Dr. Miller, uses a standardized curriculum consisting of brain exercises for association and visual imagery, education on a "healthy brain diet" and stress reduction, physical activity, and even assigned memory exercises to be performed at home.
The investigators have previously offered this program in a number of settings, including the UCLA campus and senior centers. However, this is the first time it was offered in a retirement living community, which made participation easier because "users did not have to drive to a class off-site," said Dr. Small.
"Our group tends to study memory training and healthy lifestyle techniques from the point of view of first developing a program that we think is user friendly and then testing it out. However, many times there's the approach where a scientific study is done first. So a program may be proven to be effective or not, but the question is: Will people use it? And will it be adaptable to a lot of communities?" he said.
For the study, 115 residents of 2 continuing-care communities in Maryland older than 62 years (mean age, 80.9 years; 79% women; 98% white) who had slight memory complaints but no diagnosis of dementia were enrolled and tested for memory performance.
After testing, participants were randomly assigned either to undergo the memory fitness program, consisting of 12 twice-weekly, hour-long sessions (15 - 20 per class), or to be placed on a waiting list for the program and considered study controls.
Objective cognitive measures during the pretesting phase, as well as at baseline and at study's end, assessed changes in immediate and in delayed verbal memory, retention of verbal information, memory recognition, and verbal fluency.
Subjective measures evaluated domains of memory self-awareness, including frequency and severity of forgetting, mnemonics use, and retrospective functioning.
Generalizeable Results?
Results showed that the patients who underwent the memory fitness program showed significant improvements postintervention on recognition memory for word pairs (P < .001) and retention of verbal list learning (P < .01).
In addition, their retrospective functioning scores increased (P < .0001), "indicating a belief in having a better memory," write the investigators.
"These findings indicate that a 6-week healthy lifestyle program can improve both encoding and recalling of new verbal information as well as self-perception of memory ability in older adults," they write, noting that it may be generalizable to a real-world setting.
"As a community-based educational intervention, the program has the potential to meet the community's need for an affordable and sustainable memory program over time."
John Parrish, PhD, executive director of the Erickson Foundation, which oversees the retirement communities used in this study, said in a release that the foundation is now offering the program in all 16 of their communities across the country.
"The study suggests that the memory fitness program may be a cost-effective means of addressing some memory-related concerns of healthy older adults," he said.
Dr. Small said that he hopes that clinicians will see from this study and others that mild, age-related memory complaints can improve with specific training.
"There are a lot of ways to learn memory techniques. I think physicians should first ask people about their memory concerns and then try to refer them to get some help," he said.
"It's important to empower people and teach them about healthy brain lifestyle. Although there's no absolute proof that you can prevent Alzheimer's disease, we know that physical exercise and healthy diet can prevent diabetes, which is itself a major risk factor for Alzheimer's. So it all seems to tie together."
The study was supported by the Fran and Ray Stark Foundation Fund for Alzheimer's Disease Research, the Judith Olenick Elgart Fund for Research on Brain Aging, and the Parlow-Solomon Professorship. Dr. Small reports having served as a consultant and/or having received lecture and stock options in Dakim, Inc. and is author of the forthcoming book, The Alzheimer's Prevention Program. Dr. Miller and one other study author report having received grant support from Dakim.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. Published online July 14, 2011. Abstract
 
 

A Drink a Day May Keep Alzheimer's Away


A Drink a Day May Keep Alzheimer's Away

Fran Lowry
Physician Rating: 4.5 stars  ( 75 Votes )           
Rate This Article:
  
    
August 26, 2011 — Light to moderate drinking seems to reduce the risk for dementia and cognitive decline, according to a new study published in the August issue of Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment.
A meta-analysis of 143 studies on the effects of alcohol on the brain showed that moderate drinking, defined as no more than 2 drinks a day for a man and no more than 1 drink a day for a woman, reduced the risk for Alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia by 23%.
"It doesn't seem to matter if it's beer, wine, or spirits, as long as the drinking was moderate," Edward J. Neafsey, PhD, from the Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Therapeutics at Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, told Medscape Medical News.
Dr. Edward J. Neafsey
Dr. Neafsey and coauthor Michael A. Collins, PhD, became interested in seeing whether alcohol might be protective of human brains after their experiments showed that rat brains exposed to low doses of alcohol for a few days demonstrated resiliency when subsequently treated with a toxin.
"If the rat brain slices were treated for 5 or 6 days with low alcohol and then the toxin was administered, there was hardly any damage, whereas if they didn't get the pretreatment with alcohol, there was significant damage. This led us to ask if there was anything in the human literature that would fit with this protective effect of alcohol," Dr. Neafsey explained.
The researchers reviewed studies dating from 1977 up to the present. The studies fell into 2 categories: those that provided ratios of risk between drinkers and nondrinkers (n = 74) and those that rated cognition in drinkers as "better," "no different," or "worse" than cognition in nondrinkers (n = 69).
Heavy Drinking a Different Story
Light to moderate drinking conferred a similar benefit, but heavy drinking (more than 3 - 5 drinks/day) was associated with a nonsignificantly higher risk for dementia and cognitive impairment.
Most of the studies did not distinguish between the different types of alcohol, but in a few studies, wine appeared to be more beneficial than beer or spirits. "It really seemed to be that alcohol per se was protective, not the type, because the few studies that did make the distinction reported no difference among the effects of the different types of alcohol," Dr. Neafsey said.
The protective effect of moderate drinking held after adjusting for age, education, sex, and smoking.
A number of explanations for the protective effect of moderate alcohol have been proposed. Some dementias are related to cardiovascular system problems, such as atherosclerosis, and alcohol may be protective because it raises the level of high-density lipoprotein (the good) cholesterol and might improve blood flow in the brain.
One theory that Dr. Neafsey and Dr. Collins are working on now holds that alcohol acts as a mild stressor for brain cells and "preconditions" them, making them better able to ward off stress.
"Alcohol doesn't kill the brain cells, but it's a slight stress. When the cells are exposed they increase levels of various protective compounds, so...they are prepared when something more stressful that might kill or damage them comes along. The theory is called 'preconditioning,' where a mild stress given a few days before a severe stress causes a significant protection."
Understanding the mechanism of alcohol's protective effect could lead to a treatment to prevent cognitive impairment and dementias, Dr. Neafsey said.
"Whether it's treatment with a pill or a lifestyle change, if we could understand the mechanism, it would improve our ability to deal with these illnesses," he said.
Novel Approach
Medscape Medical News asked Anton P. Porsteinsson, MD, the William B. and Sheila Konar professor of psychiatry at the University of Rochester School of Medicine, New York, to comment on this study.
"This is a well-done meta analysis. The findings are consistent with other meta analyses that have been done. Am I tremendously surprised at the findings? No, because they are looking at the same pool of studies," Dr. Porsteinsson said.
"The fact that they approach it in slightly different ways and yet find similar outcomes makes me confident that this is what the data are actually signaling to us: that very modest alcohol consumption is protective," he said.
The next step is to figure out how moderate alcohol consumption exerts its protective effect.
"Is it some direct effect of the alcohol on the brain? Are people who consume moderate amounts of alcohol different in some way, in their diet, or their level of exercise? Are low concentrations of alcohol neuroprotective? Is it through some metabolic impact?" Dr. Porsteinsson said.
Also interesting was that alcohol appeared to protect against all types of dementia, he said.
"This makes it less likely to have a direct effect on beta amyloid or tau, but more of a global effect. It is an interesting review. They made it a pleasure to read."
The study was supported by the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Neafsey, Dr. Collins, and Dr. Porsteinsson have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
Neuropsychiatric Dis Treat. 2011;7:465-484. Abstract
 
 

Maternal Depression Leads to Brain Changes in Children
Megan Brooks

August 17, 2011 — Children who grow up with a depressed mother, who probably is not as attentive as a nondepressed mother, may develop an enlarged amygdala, the part of the brain linked to emotional responses, a new study suggests.
In the study, researchers observed significantly larger amygdala volume in 10-year-old children whose mothers struggled with depression throughout their young lives compared with their peers who had not been exposed to maternal depression.
Sonia Lupien, PhD, from the Mental Health Institute of University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and colleaguesreport their study online August 15 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Enlarged amygdala volumes have also been seen in adoptees initially raised in orphanages, the study team notes.
Taken together, the findings suggest that the developing amygdala may be very sensitive to the quality and quantity of maternal care.
"Maternal depressive symptomatology has been associated with reductions in overall sensitivity to the infant and with an increased rate of withdrawn, disengaged behaviors," Dr. Lupien and her colleagues write.
The message, Dr. Lupien told Medscape Medical News, is that it is "important to treat the depressed patient, but also take into account the family unit."
"Many clinicians only concentrate on the patient that they treat, but other members of the family may also suffer from the depression of an adult (spouses and/or children)," Dr. Lupien added.
"No individual is alone in depression and it might be important to take care of the children as well as the mother and/or father in order to prevent the effects of depression from spilling over other family members."
Long-Term Consequences Unknown
Dr. Lupien and colleagues measured hippocampal and amygdala volume as well as stress hormone (glucocorticoid) levels in 17 children exposed to maternal depression since birth and 21 who were not. All of the children were 10 years old at assessment.
They found larger left and right amygdala volumes (P < .01) in the children exposed to maternal depression since birth compared with children without this exposure. They also observed a significant positive correlation between mothers' mean depression score over the first 7 years of the child's life and her own child's mean amygdala volume (P < .0001).
Hippocampal volumes did not differ between children exposed or unexposed to maternal depression, which isn't all that surprising, Dr. Lupien said.
Many studies, she explained, have shown hippocampal atrophy in adults, but not children, who report exposure to childhood adversity.
"This has led to the 'incubation hypothesis' whereby the effects of stress during childhood may only be apparent during adulthood (they may take time to emerge). This would be why we see hippocampal atrophy in adults exposed to early adversity but not in children exposed to adversity," Dr. Lupien said.
The investigators also observed increased salivary glucocorticoid levels (P < .05) in the children of depressed mothers when they were presented with unfamiliar situations, suggesting increased reactivity to stress in those children.
"The long term consequences of this increased reactivity to stress are unknown at this point," Dr. Lupien said.
Sensitive to Neglect
Medscape Medical News asked Nim Tottenham, PhD, assistant professor of psychology, Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, for her thoughts on this study.
Dr. Tottenham was involved in the study, reported by Medscape Medical News, that found enlarged amygdala volumes and difficulties in emotion regulation in a group of children reared in orphanages (Dev Sci2010;13:46-61).
The current study, Dr. Tottenham said, "is very similar to what we had published in children adopted from orphanages (which is important), but I think what is most novel is that these children had experienced a more 'species-typical' rearing environment and yet showed the same phenotype."
"Taken together," Dr. Tottenham said, "the studies are showing that the developing human amygdala is highly sensitive to maternal neglect, whereas the hippocampus, unlike in adults, fails to show an impact during childhood."
"A strength of the paper," she said, "was that all the children were exactly 10 years old and the mother's depression was well-characterized across those 10 years."
"I sincerely think," Dr. Lupien commented, "that developing interventions to help parents and children deal with the stress associated with depression in one family member could provide very positive results for all the family members, and society at large."
The study was supported by grants from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, and Fonds de recherche en santé du Québec. The authors and Dr. Tottenham have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
Proc Natl Acad SciPublished online August 15, 2011.

Updated Influenza Vaccine Recommendations Issued


Updated Influenza Vaccine Recommendations Issued
Megan Brooks 
  

 August 18, 2011 — Updated guidance for influenza vaccination in the United States for the upcoming 2011-2012 influenza season has been released by federal health officials with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
"There are relatively few changes from 2010-2011 recommendations," Carolyn Bridges, MD, associate director for adult immunization, Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Disease, said during a telebriefing today.
As a result, the 2011-2012 recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices have been issued in a shortened format, Dr. Bridges noted.
The report was published online August 18 in the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.
The 2010 recommendation for routine annual influenza vaccination for all persons aged 6 months or older in the United States has not changed.
"We continue to recommend that people age 6 months and older be vaccinated," Dr. Bridges emphasized.
To allow time for production of protective antibody levels, "vaccination should optimally occur before onset of influenza activity in the community, and providers should offer vaccination as soon as vaccine is available," the report reads. "Vaccination also should continue to be offered throughout the influenza season."
Vaccine Strains Identical to Last Year
This year's seasonal influenza vaccine virus strains are identical to those contained in last year's vaccine. These include A/California/7/2009 (H1N1)-like, A/Perth/16/2009 (H3N2)-like, and B/Brisbane/60/2008-like antigens. The influenza A (H1N1) vaccine virus strain is derived from a 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus.
Dr. Bridges emphasized that the recommendation for annual vaccination remains in place, even though the strains of this year's vaccine are the same as those in 2010-2011.
"Levels of protective antibody against influenza viruses can decline over the course of a year, so even people who got a flu vaccine last year should get vaccinated again this year to ensure that they are optimally protected," she said.
The report reminds providers that children aged 6 months through 8 years need 2 doses of influenza vaccine, administered a minimum of 4 weeks apart, during their first season of vaccination to optimize immune response.
In past influenza seasons, children aged 6 months through 8 years who received only 1 dose of influenza vaccine in their first year of vaccination required 2 doses the following season. However, because the 2011-2012 vaccine strains are unchanged from the 2010-2011 vaccine strains, "children in this age group who received at least 1 dose of the 2010-2011 seasonal vaccine will require only 1 dose of the 2011-2012 vaccine," the report states.
"Children in this age group who did not receive at least 1 dose of the 2010-2011 seasonal influenza vaccine, or for whom it is not certain whether the 2010-2011 seasonal vaccine was received, should receive 2 doses of the 2011-2012 seasonal influenza vaccine." it adds.
Multiple Products to Be Available
Multiple influenza vaccines are expected to be available during the upcoming influenza season, all containing the same antigenic composition, the CDC notes.
"We are anticipating, based on reports from manufacturers, that probably 166 million or so doses of vaccine will be produced this year; that compares with 157 million doses that were distributed last year," Dr. Bridges said.
The updated recommendations make note of the new intradermally administered trivalent inactivated vaccine (TIV) preparation (Fluzone Intradermal, Sanofi Pasteur) licensed in May 2011.
This vaccine is indicated for people 18 to 64 years old and contains less antigen than intramuscular TIV preparations (9 μg vs 15 μg of each strain per dose) in a smaller volume (0.1 mL vs 0.5 mL).
This vaccine is administered in a single dose (preferably over the deltoid muscle) and comes in a prefilled microinjection syringe. The most common adverse reactions include injection-site erythema, induration, swelling, pain, and pruritus, the CDC notes. With the exception of pain, these reactions occurred more frequently than with intramuscular vaccine, but generally resolved within 3 to 7 days.
"This vaccine is an alternative to other TIV preparations for those in the indicated age range, with no preferential recommendation," the agency writes.
Recommendations for People With Egg Allergy
When considering influenza vaccination in people who have or report a history of egg allergy, several considerations must be taken into account, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices notes. For those who have experienced only hives after exposure to egg, it is recommended that the inactivated vaccine, rather than live attenuated vaccine, be used.
For these individuals, it is also recommended that vaccine be administered by a healthcare provider familiar with the potential manifestations of egg allergy, and that vaccine recipients be observed for at least 30 minutes after receipt of the vaccine.
"Other measures, such as dividing and administering the vaccine by a two-step approach and skin testing with vaccine, are not necessary," the report states.
The report also states that persons who have had reactions to egg involving angioedema, respiratory distress, lightheadedness, or recurrent emesis, or those who required epinephrine or other emergency medical intervention, are more likely to have a serious systemic or anaphylactic reaction on reexposure to egg proteins. "Before receipt of vaccine, such persons should be referred to a physician with expertise in the management of allergic conditions for further risk assessment," the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends.
"A previous severe allergic reaction to influenza vaccine, regardless of the component suspected to be responsible for the reaction, is a contraindication to receipt of influenza vaccine," the report states.
Vaccination Rates Still Low in Providers, Pregnant Women
During the telebriefing, Dr. Bridges reported data on vaccination rates in 2 key groups: healthcare providers and pregnant women. She said that although vaccination rates have risen in healthcare providers, they still remain "far too low."
During the 2010-2011 season, estimated coverage rates among healthcare personnel were 63.5%, which is "well below the Healthy People 2020 goal of 90%," Dr. Bridges noted. The 63.5% coverage rate for the 2010-2011 season is up from the 62% coverage rate in the prior season (2009-2010), she noted.
It is currently recommended that all healthcare personnel be vaccinated annually. This is "important for patient safety, and healthcare facilities should make influenza vaccine readily available to all healthcare personnel as part of a comprehensive infection control program," Dr. Bridges said.
Influenza vaccine coverage rates among pregnant women also remain low, according to Dr. Bridges, with only about half of pregnant women in the United States getting vaccinated during the 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 seasons.
"Pregnant women and children younger than 6 months of age are known to be at higher risk for severe illness from influenza," Dr. Bridges noted. "Vaccination during pregnancy has been shown to decrease the risk [for] illness in the mother, as well as the risk of influenza and influenza hospitalization in their infants during the first 6 months of life."
"Continued efforts are needed to encourage providers to strongly recommend and offer vaccination to their pregnant patients," Dr. Bridges said.
Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. Published online August 18, 2001. Full tex
t

Triva Case

A 61-Year-Old Man With Crampy Abdominal Pain






A 61-year-old white man presents to the emergency department with a 1-week history of diffuse "crampy" abdominal pain. For the past 2 months, he has had diarrhea and has been passing blood with every bowel movement, either on the stool surface or separately from the stool. Recently, he has had 10-15 loose stools per day, with associated urgency and tenesmus. He has lost 4 lb in the past week. He feels lightheaded upon standing and is experiencing fatigue and mild shortness of breath. He takes atorvastatin for hypercholesteremia and acetaminophen for intermittent back and knee pain. He is allergic to penicillin. He has no history of gastrointestinal tract disease; screening colonoscopy performed 2 years ago was unremarkable. His father died of myocardial infarction when he was in his 60s, and his mother died of breast cancer when she was in her 40s. He has no siblings. He is retired from his work as an accountant and lives with his wife. He has not travelled recently. He has a 25-pack-year smoking history but has not smoked for approximately 10 years. He drinks alcohol on social occasions and on weekends, and he denies illicit drug abuse.
On physical examination, the patient is a pale, diaphoretic man in some distress due to abdominal pain. His oral temperature is 101.5°F (38.6°C), blood pressure is 110/62 mm Hg, pulse is 107 beats/min, and respiratory rate is 24 breaths/min. His body mass index is 29.7 kg/m2. Examination of his head and neck is unremarkable aside from pale mucosal membranes. Lung auscultation reveals normal breath sounds, with no crackles or rhonchi. His heart rate is tachycardic, and his heart rhythm is regular. There are no murmurs or extra heart sounds. His abdomen is distended and firm, with diffuse rebound tenderness that seems worse in the lower left quadrant. Bowel sounds are diminished. No hepatosplenomegaly, ascites, or palpable masses are appreciated. Digital rectal examination demonstrates normal rectal tone, "velvety" rectal mucosa, and bright red blood on withdrawal of the examining finger. There is pitting edema of the legs and feet.
Laboratory analysis includes a complete blood count (CBC), which demonstrates anemia (hemoglobin concentration of 6.7 g/dL [67 g/L]), leukocytosis (leukocyte count of 14.2 x 103 cells/μL [14.2 x 109 cells/L]), and thrombocytosis (platelet count of 540 x 103 cells/µL [540 x 109 cells/L]). Additional findings include elevations in the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (78 mm/h) and C-reactive protein level (114 mg/L). His albumin level is low, at 2.0 g/dL (20 g/L). The basic metabolic panel is unremarkable. Repeat stool cultures and samples for ova and parasites are negative. Flexible sigmoidoscopy shows diffusely erythematous and friable colonic mucosa with large ulcerated patches, abundant yellow-white exudate, and oozing blood. These findings extend in a proximal and continuous fashion from the rectum to at least the middle of the sigmoid colon. Tissue biopsy samples sent for histopathologic examination reveal lymphoplasmacytic inflammation along the base of the crypts; neutrophils that infiltrate the crypt epithelium and collect in the depths of the colonic crypts to form "crypt abscesses"; and focal chronic reactive changes, including crypt branching, gland atrophy, and goblet-cell mucin depletion. No granulomas are identified.

What is the most likely diagnosis?

Hint: Note the frequent passage of bloody loose stools for more than 2 months in the setting of fever, tachycardia, and anemia.


The diagnosis of fulminant ulcerative colitis, an idiopathic form of inflammatory bowel disease, was initially suspected on the basis of the patient's history, physical examination, and laboratory test results; endoscopic and biopsy findings confirmed the diagnosis. The rectal bleeding was bright red, indicating that the source of the bleeding was most likely the lower gastrointestinal tract. The concurrent presence of crampy abdominal pain, diarrhea, tenesmus, and fever suggested that an inflammatory process had damaged the colonic mucosa. The unremarkable colonoscopy findings 2 years before presentation rendered a neoplasm unlikely. Although not impossible, it is rare for colon cancer to present with diarrhea. Most compelling was the continuity and character of the mucosal damage identified on endoscopy and the histopathologic findings, which were diagnostic of ulcerative colitis. Symptom duration suggested a chronic inflammatory process and infectious causes of colitis had been ruled out.
Ulcerative colitis is estimated to respectively have an incidence of 7.3 and prevalence of 116 per 100,000 people in the United States.[1] The peak age at onset is 15-25 years, with a second peak at 40-60 years.[2] Individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish or Scandinavian descent are more often affected, with men and women experiencing a similar disease incidence. Smoking seems to play a protective role against the development of ulcerative colitis, and it has been proposed that the second incidence peak in part represents patients who stopped smoking at a later age.[3] Most research suggests that the etiology and pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis are multifactorial, with a combination of genetic susceptibility, bacterial antigens, and alteration of mucosal immunity responsible for the development of the disease.[4]
Histopathologically, ulcerative colitis is characterized by lymphoplasmacytic inflammation of the mucosa and submucosa, with scattered neutrophils in the lamina propria (Figure 1). The neutrophils typically injure the crypt epithelium and may collect in the base of the crypts, forming crypt abscesses (Figure 2). Within weeks of disease onset, features of crypt architectural distortion (such as crypt branching and shortening) develop; these chronic changes are a nonspecific regenerative response to previous injury. Deep granulomas and transmural inflammation, 2 hallmarks of Crohn's disease, do not occur.[5]
Classically, ulcerative colitis is insidious in onset. Affected patients present with frequent passage of bloody, loose stools and tenesmus. The intensity of the symptoms generally correlates with the extent of anatomic involvement, allowing classification of disease as mild, moderate, or severe/fulminant. The majority of patients have mild, indolent disease limited to the rectum and sigmoid colon that is characterized by diarrhea, intermittent rectal bleeding, and tenesmus. The physical examination is often normal aside from bright red blood within the rectum. Other patients present with systemic symptoms, including more frequent bowel movements, crampy abdominal pain, decreased bowel sounds, high-grade fever, tachycardia, anemia, orthostatic hypotension, and weight loss. Extraintestinal manifestations, such as acute arthropathy, episcleritis, erythema nodosum, and pyoderma gangrenosum may also arise. Fewer than 10% of patients with ulcerative colitis initially present with fulminant disease, with older individuals represented in greater numbers. Fulminant ulcerative colitis is more abrupt in onset and is usually characterized by extensive colonic involvement ("pancolitis"), with rectal bleeding that may be extensive enough to necessitate blood transfusion. Abdominal distention and tenderness to palpation with signs of peritoneal inflammation (eg, rebound tenderness) may be observed in these patients. Of greatest concern in patients with fulminant disease is the prospect of massive hemorrhage, toxic megacolon, or bowel perforation. Immediate hospitalization is often necessary in these patients.
The differential diagnosis of bright red blood in the rectum associated with diarrhea includes infectious colitis, ischemic colitis, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug enteropathy. Other causes of colonic bleeding, such as diverticular disease, can present with loose stools, because blood is a cathartic. Stool studies (eg, fecal leukocytes, culture, ova, and parasites) and a Clostridium difficile toxin screen should be considered to eliminate the possibility of infectious colitis. A complete blood cell count should be obtained to evaluate for anemia or leukocytosis. Low albumin levels signify poor nutritional status and protein-losing enteropathy. A basic metabolic panel may demonstrate electrolyte abnormalities in the setting of severe prolonged diarrhea. Inflammatory markers, such as the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level, are typically elevated in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Radiographic studies may be used as an adjunct in diagnosing complications of ulcerative colitis (eg, plain films can establish the presence of toxic megacolon). In the setting of acute flares, other radiologic studies, such as computed tomography (CT), may be done to evaluate for an alternative diagnosis. Common CT findings in ulcerative colitis include thickening of the colonic wall, pericolonic fat stranding, and a "target" appearance of the rectum. Most important in confirming the diagnosis of ulcerative colitis is flexible sigmoidoscopy with biopsy; colonoscopy may also be used in some settings, but it is associated with a higher risk for perforation and is contraindicated in cases of suspected toxic megacolon. Typical endoscopic findings in ulcerative colitis patients include diffuse erythema; edema; friability; and granularity of the mucosa, with loss of the normal vascular pattern. Ulceration with exudate and pseudopolyps are frequently identified as well. These findings invariably begin in the rectum and extend proximally in a continuous manner, up to and including the cecum, in cases of pancolitis.[6]
In most cases, ulcerative colitis can be managed in the outpatient setting. Treatment is designed to achieve and maintain disease remission. Topical therapy and 5-aminosalicylic acid (ASA) agents are the first-line means of treating ulcerative colitis, with steroids for acute flares and immunomodulators as maintenance therapy in severe refractory disease. Fulminant ulcerative colitis requires careful attention to the development of toxic megacolon. Parenteral corticosteroids; rehydration; bowel rest; nutritional supplementation; anticoagulation with low-dose heparin to prevent venous thrombosis, which is common in patients with ulcerative colitis; and monitoring of hemoglobin values (with transfusion sometimes required) are recommended. If remission is achieved, a maintenance regimen consisting of immunomodulators (such as cyclosporine, 6-mercaptopurine, or azathioprine) and/or 5-ASA should be initiated. In patients with fulminant ulcerative colitis that is refractory to first-line therapy, infusion of a biologic agent (such as infliximab) or colectomy may be necessary.[7]
The patient in this case was immediately admitted to the hospital because of concerns that he was at risk for massive hemorrhage, toxic megacolon, or bowel perforation. Three units of cross-matched blood were transfused, and he was prescribed bowel rest, peripheral hyperalimentation, and prednisolone. Shortly thereafter, 5-ASA was added to his therapeutic regimen. His symptoms resolved gradually, and he was discharged to home. Over the next few years, he experienced several disease flares, and the benefits and risks of immunomodulators and biologic agents versus colectomy were reviewed with him during a particularly severe flare. After considerable reflection, he decided in favor of colectomy; the patient tolerated the operation well. Gross examination of the colectomy specimen demonstrated involvement of the entire colon from cecum to anus. Multiple irregular ulcers with an associated yellow-white exudate were scattered throughout the colon, and diffuse pseudopolyps (Figure 3) were present. Findings consistent with Crohn's disease (eg, fissures, fistulas, perianal involvement, "creeping fat," and segmental disease) were not identified. As expected, the procedure resulted in complete remission of the patient's symptoms. After ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery, most patients can expect to have 4-6 loose bowel movements per day.

Q1. You are caring for a patient with abdominal pain, fever, and hematochezia and are concerned that the patient has ulcerative colitis. Which finding is most consistent with a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis?


Pseudopolyps Correct Answer  41%

Segmental disease ("skip lesions")    15%

Perianal involvement    12%

Transmural inflammation    25%

Deep granulomas    7%
 Pseudopolyps are a common alteration of the colonic mucosa in patients with long-standing active ulcerative colitis; they are raised areas of inflamed, regenerative tissue arising in a background of ulceration. When present in significant numbers, pseudopolyps can cause cobblestoning of the mucosa that does not regress, even with treatment. Segmental disease ("skip lesions"), perianal involvement, transmural inflammation, and granulomas are all manifestations of Crohn's disease, another form of inflammatory bowel disease.


Q2. You are caring for a patient with known ulcerative colitis. Which of the following clinical manifestations is more worrisome for severe or fulminant ulcerative colitis?

Hematochezia    31%

Diarrhea    6%

Sacroiliitis    7%

High-grade fever Correct Answer  50%

Tenesmus
 7%